ARUN BHANSALI
Sushila Khichar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
Arun Bhansali, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to call the petitioner for PST/PET and appoint her on the post of Constable (General) pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.05.2018.
2. It is, inter-alia, indicated in the writ petition that the petitioner participated in the recruitment for Constable (General) pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.05.2018; the result of the written examination was declared, wherein the petitioner scored 44.25 marks and was called for PST/PET on 02.09.2018 vide Annex. 4. However, as the petitioner had given birth to a child on 18.08.2018, she was not in physical condition to participate in the PST/PET and claims to have sent a representation to the respondents for postponing her PST/PET, however, the same was not accepted and the petitioner on account of non-participation in the PET/PST could not get selected.
3. Submissions have been made that this Court in Raju Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No. 13486/2018, decided on 28.09.2018, pertaining to the same recruitment, relying on the Division Bench judgment in the case of Laxmi Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : DBCWP No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.