Balram Jat vs State of Rajasthan - 2019 Supreme(Raj) 1029

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Raj) 1029

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Balram Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : B.S. Rathore, R.K. Bishnoi, Bhagat Dadhich.
For the Respondents: Anil Joshi, J.S. Khinchi.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The appellants Balram, Omprakash @ Oma and Smt. Guddi have been convicted and sentenced as below by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Hanumangarh vide judgment dated 15.02.2012 passed in Sessions Case No. 31/2011 (33/2009):-

Names of the appellants	Offence for which convicted	Sentence awarded
Balram Omprakash @ Oma Smt. Guddi	Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 120-B IPC	Imprisonment for life alongwith a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five months.
Balram Omprakash @ Oma Smt. Guddi	Section 201 IPC, in the alternative Section 201 read with Section 34 and 120-B IPC	Rigorous imprisonment of seven years alongwith a fine of Rs. 1000 and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo rigorous imprisonment of one month.

All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of their conviction and the sentences awarded, the appellants have preferred the instant appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Since all the thr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Raj) 1029

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHURBalram Jat – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Balram Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent