DINESH MEHTA
Sohan Lal Paliwal – Appellant
Versus
Amba Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Mehta, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved of the order dated 25.04.2019, passed by the Appellate Rent Tribunal, rejecting petitioner's appeal against the judgment and certificate of recovery dated 26.09.2016, the petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court, enshrined under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Before adverting to the questions raised by the petitioner, it would be appropriate to glance through factual canvas, which unfolds as under:-
2.1. The petitioner is a tenant of respondent-landlord, who filed an eviction petition under Section 9(a) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2001'), on the ground of default in payment of rent.
2.2. In the petition so filed by the respondent-landlord on 30.09.2010, it was asserted that the petitioner has defaulted in making payment of the rent from 16.07.2009 till 15.09.2010 and the total amount for the period of 14 months, turn out to be Rs. 4,550/-. It was averred that a notice dated 09.02.2010 contemplated under Section 9(a) of the Act of 2001 was given to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.