DINESH MEHTA
Gagandeep – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Mehta, J.
1. The petitioner has approached this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India laying challenge to his rejection of his candidature as an outstanding sports person, pursuant to the advertisement dated 14.02.2013.
2. The facts in nutshell relevant for the present purposes are, that the respondent - State issued an advertisement for recruitment of Lower Division Clerk on 14.02.2013, fixing the last date of submitting application form as 22.03.2013, said date was subsequently extended to 18.04.2013.
3. The advertisement provided reservation to the extent of 2% of the seats to 'Outstanding Sports Person'. Relevant Clause - 6 of the advertisement aforesaid reads thus:
¼1½ mDr fjfDr;ksa ds vkj{k.k fu;ekuqlkj ns; gSA
¼2½ dfu"B fyfid HkrhZ esa 12-5 izfr'kr HkwriwoZ lSfudksa ds fy;s rFkk 2 izfr'kr in mRd`"V f[kykfM+;ks ds fy;s vkjf{kr jgsaxsA ;s vkj{k.k n.Mor gksxk ,oa oxkZuqlkj in Hkjs tk;saxsA mRd`"V f[kykfM;ksa ls rkRi;Z ,sls f[kykfM+;ksa ls gS tks varjkZ"Vh; Lrj ij fdlh [ksy esa Hkkx fy;k gks rFkk izFke@f}rh; vFkok r`rh; LFkku izkIr fd;k gqvk gksA
Li"Vhdj.k & ¼1½ mRd`"V f[kykfM+;ks ls vfHkizsr gS vkSj mlesa lfEefyr gS jkT; ds ,sls f[kykM+
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.