ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Shyam Sunder Singhvi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHOK KUMAR GAUR, J.
1. The present order will decide two sets of cases i.e. Revision Petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 21.01.2019 passed by the Special Sessions Court, Jaipur (Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002) - Special Court (Communal Riots Cases), Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, whereby cognizance has been taken for offence punishable under Sections 3 & 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter shall be referred as 'PMLA, 2002') & arrest warrants have been issued to secure the presence of the accused persons.
2. The other set of cases are Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging order of the Trial Court wherein it has refused to convert arrest warrants of the petitioners into bailable warrants by not exercising power under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C.
(Revision Petitions)
3. This Court has taken note of the facts from the file of S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 273/2019 (Shyam Sundar Singhvi Vs. Union of India), which is treated as the lead case. The facts, in nutshell, are that Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur on 19.09.2015 registered an FIR bearing No. 251/2
Popular Muthiah Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police reported in 2006 (6) JT 332
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I
Inder Mohan Goswami Vs. State of Uttranchal reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1
Inder Mohan Goswami Vs. State of Uttranchal reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs. CBI reported in (2013) 7 SCC 439
State of Gujarat Vs. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal and Anr. Reported in (1987) 2 SCC 364
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.