SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 133

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Ramdayal Namdev – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arvind Kumar Gupta
For the Respondents: Ramesh Choudhary, PP

ORDER :

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.

1. The petitioner by way of this criminal misc. petition prays for quashing of an FIR No. 199/2012 registered at Police Station Jhalra Patan, Jhalawar on 5.9.2012 for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC. During the pendency of this petition, the proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner under Section 37 of the Police Act issuing standing arrest warrants against him. Thereafter, the charge sheet has been filed against him under Section 299 Cr.P.C. in absence of the petitioner for offences under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Anand Kumar Mohatta & Others v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Department of Home and Others reported in AIR 2019 SC 210, the petitioner who has assailed the FIR can also challenge the charge sheet if during the pendency of petition it has submitted the charge sheet.

3. Learned counsel submits that although the petitioner was not named in the FIR but since in subsequent investigation, the petitioner has been made as an accused, he is entitled to challenge the FIR as well as the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top