PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Neena Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - The petitioner has preferred this writ petition claiming following prayers:-
(I) By a writ of mandamus the impugned order dated 18.8.2010 (Annex.1), may kindly be quashed and set aside.
(ii) By writ of mandamus it may be directed that petitioner shall be deemed to be continued in service with effect from the same date and shall be entitled to all consequential reliefs.
(iii) That any other writ, order or direction, which your lordship may deem fit and proper, be passed in the interest of justice and to grant adequate relief to the petitioner.
(iv) The costs of the writ petition may also be granted in favour of the petitioner."
2. The petitioner was appointed as Nurse Grade-II on 12.09.1983 and she has rendered satisfactory unblemished services and has been superannuated on 30.11.2017. The petitioner was served upon a charge-sheet on 18.12.2004 under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short as "CCA Rules, 1958") for violation of Rule 25 of Rajasthan Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "Rules of 1971"). The Enquiry Officer submitted a report on 3.5.2009 before th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.