GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Amu Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kheta Ram – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Goverdhan Bardhar, J. - The appellant plaintiffs have filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.02.2017 whereby, the application filed by the defendant no.3 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been allowed and suit of the plaintiffs has been rejected.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant plaintiffs filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed, declaration and injunction against the respondent defendants stating therein that the land bearing Khasra No. 2840 area 23 bigha 3 biswa, Khasra NO. 2847 area 39 bigha 6 biswa total 62 bigha 9 biswa was in khatedari of their father Moti Ram. After death of Moti Ram, this land was wrongly entered in the name of Kheta Ram and Bhoora Ram. It was averred that on the basis of succession, though the plaintiffs being daughters of Moti Ram are also the successors alongwith Kheta Ram and Bhoora Ram, as such the sale deed of half share of land executed by Bhoora Ram in favour of defendant no.3 Smt. Sugni is illegal and same is liable to be cancelled. It was also prayed that the plaintiffs may be declared khatedar owner of the disputed land and injunction may be passed against the defendants not to interfere in the po
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.