DINESH MEHTA
Pekaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. - The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 24.06.2019, passed by the Additional District Collector, Jalore in a revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 97 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1994").
2. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the respondents No.2 and 3 preferred a revision petition under Section 97 of the Act of 1994 and challenged the 'Patta' No.14/1 dated 05.12.2001, issued in favour of the present petitioner. It was inter alia asserted that the resolution and consequential 'Patta' granted to the petitioner was not in conformity with the provisions, particularly Rule 157 B of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996; that the requisite compliance of the statutory provisions were not made by the then Gram Panchayat; and that the prescribed fee for issuance of 'Patta' was also not deposited by the respondent (petitioner herein). It was also asserted that the petitioner has not raised any construction over the land in question, in relation whereof the 'Patta' was issued and thus there was a breach of condition No.8 of the terms of the lease
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.