DINESH MEHTA
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Sudi Bai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. - By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has called in question, the order dated 2.7.2019, passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No.3, Udaipur (hereinafter referred to as the learned trial court), vide which petitioner's application dated 28.5.2019, filed under Order VIII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected.
2. Narrated in brief, the facts of the present case are that the petitioner herein had field a suit for specific performance against defendant- respondent herein, with an assertion that she had executed the sale deed dated 3.10.2018, made her thumb impression thereupon, but however, she refused to get it registered subsequently.
3. In response to the petitioner's suit, the defendant filed a written statement and while denying the averments made in the plaint, she stated that the sale deed in question was not executed by her and that the deed she executed, west meant for some agricultural land.
4. Being faced with such written statement, the petitioner filed an application under Order VIII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 28.5.2019 and requested that the replication be permitted to be filed. Along with the appli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.