SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 1851

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through PP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kaushal Gautam, Advocate, Farzand Ali, Advocate, S.S. Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his natural guardian father Jeetram S/o Rudaram) as well as learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondentState.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act.. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children). Act, 2015 before the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Hanumangarh was rejected vide order dated 20.09.2019. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Special Judge, Children Court, Hanumangarh and the same has been dismissed by learned Special Judge vide order dated 24.09.2019.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 20.09.2019 and 24.09.2019 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail, then his release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal, or expose them to moral, physical or psychological d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top