SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 1870

VIJAY BISHNOI
Ranjeet – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gajendra Singh Rathore, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.56/2019 of Police Station Kalu, District Bikaner for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 307, 325, 323, 341/31 of IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that allegation against the petitioners is to the effect that they inflicted injury on the head of injured Mangilal. It is further submitted that the petitioners are son-in-law of the injured Mangilal and as some dispute between the petitioners and their wives took place, injured-Mangilal and other persons came to the house of the petitioners, where during conversation, some altercation took place and at that time, both the parties quarreled with each other, in which, Mangilal received injury on the head. It is submitted that as per the medical report, there is only one injury on the head of injured Mangilal, however, the said injury has not been assigned to any of the petitioners and the witnesses have stated that both the petitioners inflicted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top