SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 1985

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Khinya Ram - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 1317 of 2019; Criminal Appeal No. 1701 of 2019
Decided On : 18-12-2019

Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Choudhary, Advocate, Hemlata Choudhary, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

The court has the discretion to suspend sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. pending the appeal, based on the entirety of facts and circumstances.

Headnote:

POCSO Act - Suspension of Sentences - The court allowed the application for suspension of sentences filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. and ordered that the sentences against the appellant shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted for offences under Sections 341 and 354 IPC read with Section 7/8 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to three years RI. The trial court had already suspended the sentence for a month.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without commenting on the merits of the case, accepted the application for suspension of sentences, considering the entirety of facts and circumstances.

Issues: The main issue was the suspension of sentences pending the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to ensure the appellant's release on bail pending the appeal, considering the time likely to be consumed in the appeal process.

Final Decision: The application for suspension of sentences was allowed, and the appellant was ordered to be released on bail till the final disposal of the appeal.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

2. The appellant applicant herein stands convicted for the offences under Sections 341 and 354 IPC read with Section 7/8 of the POCSO Act vide judgment dated 21.11.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Balotra in Sessions Case No.105/2018 and has been sentenced to maximum imprisonment of three years RI.

3. The sentence awarded to the appellant has already been suspended by the trial court for a period of one month. Hearing of the appeal is likely to consume time.

4. In this background and having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as emerging from record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am inclined to accept this application for suspension of sentences.

5. Accordingly, the instant application for suspension of sentences filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Balotra vide judgment dated 21.11.2019 in Sessions Case No.105/2018 against the appellant-applicant Khinya Ram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.80,000/- with two sureties of Rs.40,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 20.01.2020 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

5. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top