JUDGMENT

Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. - The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 7th August, 2013, passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the employer-RSRTC under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, against the petitioner has been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner received a charge-sheet dated 21st June, 2000, wherein it was alleged that on an inspection being carried out, the inspecting team found that there were 8 passengers, which were without ticket and petitioner despite having received the amount of tickets, did not issue the tickets.

3. The petitioner is said to have filed reply to the charge-sheet denying all the allegations. The employer-corporation appointed the Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and the evidence adduced were taken into account by the Enquiry Officer. The petitioner has levelled allegation that during course of enquiry, the statement of two witnesses-Shri Ramesh Tiwari and Dinesh Mudgal were recorded and in the cross-examination they had admitted that cash of the petitioner was not checked to verify the fact, as to a