SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 2187

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Dharmendra Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Vishnu Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vipul Jaiman, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. V.S. Godara, PP, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that the order dated 18.12.2018 passed by the Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 13, Jaipur Metropolitan be set aside as the trial court wrongly rejected the prayer of the petitioner under Section 91 Cr.P.C. to summon Income Tax Returns of the complainant respondent for the financial years 2012-2013, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16.

2. The petitioner had issued a cheque which on presentation had bounced. Cognizance of offence was taken after notice of accusation was served. The complainant stepped into the witness box. The petitioner conducted thorough cross-examination and in the cross-examination the complainant admitted that he has filed Income Tax Returns qua the abovesaid financial years.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that in the midst of cross-examination an application was filed that the complainant be directed to produce the income tax returns of the above said financial year.

4. The trial court rejected the prayer of the petitioner on the ground that if the complainant has failed to prove the income tax returns, he shall suffer to his own peril.

5. Learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top