PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Thr. Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. claiming the following reliefs:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and order dated 23.12.2017 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Balotra, in complaint Case No. 1055/2017 (FIR No. 192/2016 P.S. Sindhari, Case No. 1689/2017) may kindly be quashed and set aside.
Any other order which Honble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice may kindly be passed."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor jointly submit that the controversy is covered by the judgment rendered by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohan Ram @ Manaram v. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2016(3) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 1144 , wherein the following order had been passed:-
"This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1811/2015 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Balotra, District Barmer (hereinafter referred to as the trial court) against the petitioner.
In the present case, the trial court vide order dated 19.11.20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.