SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 2688

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Arjun Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Choudhary, Adv., Amardeep Lamba, Adv., J.P.S. Choudhary, Adv., Kartik Singh Lodha, Adv.

JUDGMENT

1. Cr.Appeal No.797/2016 has been preferred by the accused Arjun Ram against the judgment dated 15.7.2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Merta in Sessions Case No.102/2015 (27/2011) whereby, he was convicted for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 6 months' additional imprisonment.

2. Cr.Appeal Nos.628/2016 and 569/2017 have been preferred respectively by the complainant Manak Ram and the State of Rajasthan for challenging the very same judgment whereby the learned trial court, whilst convicting Arjun Ram for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and Budha Ram for the offence under Section 323 I.P.C., acquitted Arjun Ram from the charges under Sections 148, 341, 323 I.P.C., Budha Ram from the charges under Sections 148, 341, 302/149 I.P.C. and the accused Sukha Ram, Buksa Ram, Smt.Kamodari and Smt.Suganai from the charges under Sections 148, 341, 323, 302/149 I.P.C. by giving them benefit of doubt.

3. The prosecution case emanates from the written report (Ex.P/5) submitted by Manak Ram to the SHO, Police Station Merta City on 20.07.2011 at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top