SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 2695

DINESH MEHTA
Chetan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Hamida Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jhamk Nagda, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - The present writ petition has been preferred against the order dated 28.09.2018, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Salumber (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial court'), whereby petitioner's application dated 28.09.2018 submitted under Order XI Rules 12 & 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected.

2. The facts pertinent to present petition are that the plaintiff respondent No.1 herein had filed a suit for eviction and recovery of the arrears of rent, after giving notice under Section 106 of Transfer of the Property Act to the defendant petitioner herein.

3. The plaintiff had inter alia asserted that she had given her two shops to the defendant at the rent of 3300/- per month, in relation whereof rent note had not been prepared by the defendant. The plaintiff not only sought recovery of the arrears of rent from 21.09.2009, but also sought order of eviction of the defendant.

4. The defendant petitioner herein filed a written statement along with a counter claim and asserted that the shops in question had been purchased by him for a sum of Rs.20,52,000/- on 12.11.2011 and document / receipt in relation thereto had been executed.

5. Sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top