SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 1165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sangeet Lodha, J.
Akshaya Murali - Appellant
Versus
Central Board Of Secondary Education And Another - Respondent
Civil Writ No. 15754 of 2018
Decided On : 14-01-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. V.R. Choudhary, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Anil Kumar Khatri, Advocate, for the Respondents

The CBSE is required to correct the names of a student's parents in their Statement of Marks, Certificate of Passing and Migration Certificate in conformity with the corrected Mark Sheet and Certificates already issued by CISCE, in the interest of justice and to avoid difficulties for the student in further studies and employment.

Headnote:

CBSE EXAMINATION BYE-LAWS - RULE 69.1 - CORRECTION OF NAMES - COURT DIRECTED CBSE TO CORRECT THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONER'S PARENTS IN HER STATEMENT OF MARKS, CERTIFICATE OF PASSING AND MIGRATION CERTIFICATE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CORRECTED MARK SHEET AND CERTIFICATES ALREADY ISSUED BY CISCE.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought directions to the CBSE to correct the names of her mother and father in her Statement of Marks of Class-XII, Certificate of Passing and Migration Certificate. The names of the petitioner's father and mother were entered incorrectly in her Class-X Examination mark-sheet issued by CISCE, and the same error was carried forward in her Class-XII mark-sheet issued by CBSE.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the mistake in the petitioner's parents' names was rectified by CISCE, and the corrected Mark Sheet and Certificate of passing were issued. The court also noted that the petitioner's father is a Government employee and his Service Certificate showed his correct name. The court held that it would not be appropriate to direct the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for a declaration of the change of names, as the variance in names could create difficulties for her in further studies and employment.

Issues: Whether the CBSE was required to correct the names of the petitioner's parents in her Statement of Marks, Certificate of Passing and Migration Certificate in conformity with the corrected Mark Sheet and Certificates already issued by CISCE.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the interest of justice, the CBSE should effect the changes in the names of the petitioner's parents as prayed for, in conformity with the corrected Mark Sheet and Certificates already issued by CISCE. The court noted that the variance in the names of the petitioner's parents in the Mark Sheet and Certificate of passing of Class-X Examination and Class- XII Examination may create difficulties for the petitioner in her further studies and employment.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the CBSE to correct the names of the petitioner's parents as prayed for, in conformity with corrected Mark Sheet and Certificates of Class-X Examination issued by CISCE and issue the corrected Statement of Marks, Certificate of passing and Migration Certificate to the petitioner within four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

JUDGMENT

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking directions to the respondent Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to correct the names of her mother and father in her Statement of Marks of Class-XII, Certificate of Passing and Migration Certificate.

2. The facts relevant are that the names of the petitioners father and mother are Mr. Muraleedharan J.T. and Mrs. Manjumol C.P., however, in the mark-sheet of petitioners Class-X Examination issued by the Council for Indian School Certificate Examination (CISCE), New Delhi, their names were entered as Mualeedharan JI and Manju Murali respectively. Consequently, while seeking admission in Class-XII, which the petitioner has passed from CBSE, the names of her father and mother were mentioned as Mualeedharan and Manju Murali respectively, and thus, in the mark-sheet of her Senior School Certificate Examination 2018 issued by the CBSE, their names have been entered accordingly.

3. The petitioners father Muraleedharan J.T. is a Government employee of General Reserve Engineer Force under Ministry of Defence. The petitioner has placed on record, the Service Certificate of her father issued by the competent authority, wherein, his name is mentioned as Muraleedharan J.T. The petitioners father made application to CISCE as also to the CBSE for correction of the name in the documents. Pursuant to the application made, after correction of the names, CISCE has issued Statement of Marks and Certificate of Secondary Education after correcting the names as applied for, however, CBSE has declined to make the necessary corrections as prayed for. Hence, this petition.

4. A reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the CBSE stating that for correction of the names, the amended Rule 69.1 of the CBSE Examination Bye-laws is applicable to the candidates whose results have been declared after 25.6.15. Since the result of the petitioner was declared on 26.5.18, according to the CBSE, the change in the candidate name, mother name and father name shall be governed by amended Rule 69.1(i) and any correction in name shall be governed by amended Rule 69.1(ii). It is submitted that in the instant case the petitioner is claiming change in the names and surnames of her parents and therefore, she was required to follow the procedure as contained in Rule 69.1(i) within the stipulated time i.e. before the declaration of result and thus, now she is not entitled to get her parents name and surnames changed in the mark-sheet of Class-XII issued on 26.5.18.

5. Rule 69.1 of the Examination Bye-laws relied upon by the respondent-CBSE reads as under:

    "69.1(i) (Change in Candidate Name, Mother Name & Father Name) Applications regarding changes in name of surname of candidates will be considered provided the changes have been admitted by the Court of law and notified in the Government Gazette before the publication of the result of the candidate. In cases of change in documents after the court orders caption will be mentioned on the document

    "CHANGE ALLOWED IN NAME/FATHERS NAME/MOTHERS NAME/GUARDIANS NAME FROM ____ TO ____ ON (DATED) _____ AS PER COURT ORDER No. ____ DATED____.""

    6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that it was only an inadvertent error that the names of the petitioners father and mother were mentioned in her Statement of the Marks for Class-X and Certificate of passing as "Mualeedharan" and "Manju Murali" instead of "Muraleedharan J.T." and "Manjumol C.P." respectively, which now stand corrected by CISCE and the corrected Statement of Marks and Certificate have already been issued. It is submitted that the names in the petitioners Statement of Marks of Class-XII Examination and Certificate of passing, the names of her mother and father were mentioned as appearing in Class-X mark-sheet and certificate and since, the corrected mark-sheet has now been issued by the CISCE, there is no reason why the CBSE on the basis of the correction made as aforesaid by CISCE, sh

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top