P.K. LOHRA
Anju Devi – Appellant
Versus
Trilochan Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P K Lohra, J. - By the instant revision petition, petitioner-objector has challenged order dated 21st of December,2018 passed by Addl. District Judge, Raisinghnagar (for short, 'learned executing Court') in Execution Case No.35/15. By the order impugned, learned executing Court has rejected objections of the petitioner under Order 21 Rule 36 and Section 47 CPC.
2. The facts, in brief, are that respondent-decree-holders filed a suit for specific performance of contract against third respondent Girish Kumar pertaining to shop No.62 measuring 20 x 40.5 sq.ft. at Raisinghnagar. The agreement to sale was executed by third respondent Girish Kumar on the strength of Will dated 5th of January,2009 executed in his favour by his grandfather Onkarmal. During pendency of the suit, the parties entered into compromise and on the strength of compromise, the suit was decreed. When the decree was put to execution, on behalf of petitioner, objections were filed under Section 47 read with Order 21 Rule 36 CPC. In the application, the petitioner averred that shop in question was not exclusively owned by Onkarmal inasmuch as his two sons Purshottam and Leeladhar were having 1/3rd share each in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.