SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 1752

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Ramesh Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3879 of 2018
Decided On : 17-07-2018

Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Yadav, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms Meenakshi Pareek, PP, for the Respondent

The burden on the State Forensic Science Laboratory due to murder and rape cases influenced the court's decision not to send the cheque for comparison, while allowing the petitioner to examine a private handwriting expert at his own cost.

Headnote:

Negotiable Instruments Act - Cheque Comparison - The court upheld the trial court's decision to refuse sending the cheque to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for handwriting comparison, citing the heavy burden on the laboratory due to murder and rape cases, and allowed the petitioner to examine a private handwriting expert at his own cost.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner issued a cheque that bounced, leading to a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner requested the cheque to be sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for handwriting comparison.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the trial court's decision to refuse sending the cheque to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for comparison but allowed the petitioner to examine a private handwriting expert at his own cost.

Issues: Whether the cheque should be sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for handwriting comparison in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the heavy burden on the State Forensic Science Laboratory due to murder and rape cases and decided not to send the cheque for comparison, while allowing the petitioner to examine a private handwriting expert at his own cost.

Final Decision: The court upheld the trial court's decision to refuse sending the cheque to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for comparison but allowed the petitioner to examine a private handwriting expert at his own cost.

JUDGMENT

Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. - In the present case, the petitioner had issued a cheque, which on presentation had bounced. Consequently, the respondents had instituted a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the course of the trial, the accused-petitioner filed an application stating that the cheque be sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur for comparison by the handwriting expert.

2. This Court in the case of Rajkumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan & another, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.5149/2017, decided on 06.03.2018, has observed as under:-

"Instant petition has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973 praying therein that the order dated 24.08.2017 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Deoli District Tonk, whereby the said Court refused to send the cheque, in question to the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur, be set aside. Allegedly, the petitioner had issued a cheque, in question, which on presentation had bounced. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has denied all handwriting on the cheque, except his signatures. Counsel further contends that the petitioner accused filed an application praying that the cheque, in question be sent to the handwriting expert at State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur for comparison of the handwriting. Offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is civil in nature. It is common knowledge that the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur is heavily over burdened with the reports to be submitted in the rape and murder cases. The reports in murder and rape cases are not being presented by the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur due to lack of infrastructure. In case, the cheque, in question in a cases arising out of proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, are sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur its working shall be chocked forever. Thus, no ground for interference is made out. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may examine private handwriting expert as defence witness, at his own cost, during the course of the trial. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of."

3. In view of the order passed herein above the cheque cannot be sent for comparison to the handwriting expert at the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the order passed by the trial Court, whereby sending of the cheque, in question to the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur was refused is upheld. However, it is ordered that the petitioner shall be permitted to examine private handwriting expert at his own cost as defence witness. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top