JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Petitioner has preferred this revision petition aggrieved by order dated 19.11.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Court No.7, Jaipur City, Jaipur, whereby the court below has set aside the order of discharge of the petitioner dated 24.08.2007 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.10, Jaipur City, Jaipur and remanded the case back to the trial court to rehear the complainant and take cognizance against the petitioner. Court below has further directed the trial court that, if necessary, statements be recorded under Section 202 Cr.P.C., 1973

2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that complainant is sister-in-law of the petitioner. In the FIR lodged by complainant on 27.11.2003, she has mentioned that documents were forged by the petitioner and a forged agreement to sale was prepared. It is contended that the petitioner's wife and complainant are real sisters. Petitioner is neither a witness to the agreement, nor is he a beneficiary. It is only after petitioner's wife filed a civil suit for specific performance that the present FIR was lodged. It is contended that though it was mentioned in the initial FIR that the