IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Mr. Sandeep Mehta and Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur, JJ.
Homla - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 408 of 2017
Decided On : 12-10-2018
CRIMINAL APPEAL - DOWRY DEATH - SECTION 304B IPC - SECTION 498A IPC - SECTION 113B EVIDENCE ACT - HARASSMENT AND HUMILIATION - BURDEN OF PROOF - CONVICTION AND SENTENCE - MODIFICATION OF JUDGMENT
Fact of the Case:
Kala, a young married woman, committed suicide by hanging herself within six months of her marriage. Her father-in-law, Homla, was accused of harassing and humiliating her for dowry, leading to her death. The trial court convicted Homla under Sections 304B (dowry death) and 498A (cruelty by husband or his relatives) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced him to life imprisonment and three years' simple imprisonment, respectively.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Kala was harassed and humiliated for dowry soon before her death. The court noted that there was no allegation of dowry demand in the FIR or in the statements of material prosecution witnesses. The court also found that the immediate cause for Kala's suicide appeared to be an incident involving her silver ornaments being taken from her father's home by Homla's daughter.
Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution proved that Kala was harassed and humiliated for dowry soon before her death? 2. Whether the appellant is guilty of dowry death under Section 304B IPC?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredient of dowry harassment for the offense under Section 304B IPC. The court relied on the absence of any allegation of dowry demand in the FIR and the statements of material prosecution witnesses. The court also considered the fact that the immediate cause for Kala's suicide appeared to be an incident involving her silver ornaments being taken from her father's home.
Final Decision: The High Court partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the conviction and sentence of Homla for the offense under Section 498A IPC (cruelty by husband or his relatives) but set aside his conviction under Section 304B IPC (dowry death). Instead, the court convicted Homla for the offense under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide) and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000.
JUDGMENT
Sandeep Mehta, J. - The matter was today listed in the Court for orders on the application for suspension of sentences No.1127/2018 filed on behalf of the appellant.
2. However, with the consent of learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor, final arguments were heard and the appeal itself is being decided today. Thus the application for suspension of sentences is dismissed as infructuous.
3. By way of this criminal appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., 1973 the appellant Homla has approached this Court for assailing the judgment dated 17.02.2017 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Banswara in Sessions Case No.36/2016 whereby he was convicted and sentenced as below:-
304-B Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in IPC default of payment of fine to further undergo one year Simple Imprisonment.
498A Three Years' Simple Imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/-and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months' Simple Imprisonment.
Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
4. Facts in brief are that Kala D/o Bapulal was married to Raju S/o Homla, appellant herein on 06.06.2011. On 17.12.2011, Homla came to the village and informed Bapulal's son Dinesh that Smt. Kala had ended her life by hanging herself. On this the first informant's son Dinesh and his wife Kavita went to village Nichla Ghantala where the dead body of Smt Kala was lying on a coat. Shri Bapulal suspected foul play in the death of his daughter. He lodged a report at Police Station Kotwali Banswara on the same day casting a suspicion that Kala might have been murdered by her husband Raju.
5. A Mrig report No.42/2011 was registered and inquiry commenced. The dead body of Smt. Kala was subjected to postmortem and the medical officer opined that the cause of death was asphyxia (by pressure on neck).
6. After inquest proceedings held by the SDM, Banswara, report under Section 176 IPC was received on the basis of FIR No.376/2012 (Exhibit-P/9) came to be registered at Police Station Kotwali for the offence under Section 302 IPC. After investigation, charge sheet was filed against the appellant alone being the father-in-law of the deceased for the offences under Sections 498A & 304B IPC. The trial court framed charges against the appellant in the same terms. The appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
7. The prosecution examined as many as 15 witnesses in support of its case. The accused upon being examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C., 1973 denied the prosecution case and stated that he was not present at the spot at the time of the incident. He heard hue and cry whereupon he rushed to his house and saw the door locked from inside. The door was broken open and Smt. Kala was seen hanging from the roof. He stated that he had been falsely implicated in this case. Witness Smt. Kana was examined in defence. The trial court, after appreciating the evidence available on record came to a conclusion that the appellant had harassed and humiliated the deceased on account of demand of dowry soon before her death. It was also held that the deceased was subjected to cruelty in her matrimonial home. With these findings, the trial judge, proceeded to convict and sentence the appellant as above, hence this appeal.
8. Learned Counsel Shri Shambhoo Singh representing the appellant urged that:-
1. That there is no allegation whatsoever in the FIR (Exhibit- P/-9) that the deceased Smt. Kala was aver harassed or humiliated on account of demand of dowry
2. That the entire thrust of allegations in the written report (Exhibit-P/1), submitted by Bapulal was against the husband who was not even charge sheeted by the police.
3. That even during investigation, the material witnesses viz. PW-1 Shri Bapulal, the first informant (father of the deceased), PW-2 Smt. Meera, mother of deceased, PW-4 Dinesh, brother of the deceased, PW-5 Smt, Kavita Sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of the deceased & PW-6 Pari did not make any allegation to the effect t
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.