SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 1919

VIJAY BISHNOI
Babu Lal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dharmendra Surana, Advocate, for the Appellant ; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973 has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 17.03.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Pali (hereinafter to be referred as the 'trial court'), whereby the application filed by the petitioner for terminating the proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'the NI Act') against him has been rejected.

2. The petitioner is facing prosecution under section 138 of the NI Act before the trial court. The complainant has alleged that M/s Agarwal Textiles Industries has issued a cheque in his favour, however, the same has been dishonored by the bank and money has not been returned by the M/s Agarwal Textile Industries and as such the firm, proprietor of the said firm and signatory of the disputed cheque are liable to be prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

3. It is admitted position that the cheque in question was issued by one Ganpat Lal in the capacity of the Manager of the firm. During the pendency of the proceedings before the trial court Ganpat Lal died and at this stage, the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top