SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 2300

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Murti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sudhir Jain with Mr. Monu Kumar, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP, for the State

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Admit.

2. Record is received.

3. With consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.

4. Appellant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by judgment and order dated 07.07.2018, passed by Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Alwar, whereby appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 306 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, has been imposed on non payment of fine petitioner is to further undergo two months simple imprisonment.

5. In brief, the factual matrix of the case are that on 20.08.2017, deceased gave her parcha bayan Ex.P-18 to the effect that at 6:00 am in the morning, deceased went to the mines to give tea to her husband. A day prior to the incident brother-inlaw had a fight with her sister who also happens to be her sister in law, her brother-in-law kicked her husband. In the morning, her mother-in-law abused her, slapped her and told her to leave the house, on which she took petrol from motorcycle of her husband and set herself ablaze. On the said parcha bayan, police registered a case against the appellant and after due investigation submitted charge-sheet agai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top