SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.
Vijay Kumar Devgan - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3234 of 2019
Decided On : 08-01-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Prem Shanker Sharma, Advocate, Arvind Bhadu, Advocate

The court applied the principle of bonafide reasons for non-appearance and the provisions of section 70(2) Cr.P.C to allow the conversion of non bailable warrants to bailable warrants.

Headnote:

Bonafide Reasons - Conversion of Non Bailable Warrants to Bailable Warrants - The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance was due to bonafide and genuine reasons, and therefore, allowed the application to convert non bailable warrants to bailable warrants under section 70(2) Cr.P.C.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, suffering from a liver disease, was unable to appear in court, leading to the forfeiture of his bail bonds and issuance of non bailable warrants. His application to convert the warrants was rejected by the lower court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the petitioner's reasons for non-appearance to be bonafide and genuine, and held that the order passed by the trial court was erroneous. The petitioner was granted liberty under section 70(2) Cr.P.C to convert the warrants and was directed to appear before the trial court.

Issues: Non-appearance of the petitioner, rejection of application to convert non bailable warrants to bailable warrants, and forfeiture of bail bonds.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the bonafide reasons for the petitioner's non-appearance and the provisions of section 70(2) Cr.P.C, which allows for the conversion of warrants under certain circumstances.

Final Decision: The application to convert non bailable warrants to bailable warrants was allowed, and the orders passed by the trial court and the Learned Session Judge were set aside. The petitioner was directed to appear before the trial court on a specified date and participate regularly in the proceedings.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J. - The petitioner by way of this petition assails the order dated 30th July, 2018 & order dated 3.10.2018 passed in revision petition whereby application moved by him u/s 70(2) Cr.P.C for converting non bailable warrants into bailable warrants was rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering from liver disease since 24th April, 2016 and he is under treatment. The petitioner is 69 years old person. The case was registered against him u/s 19(1)A of the Fertilizer Control Act, 1985 and u/s 3/7 Essential Commodities Act. The petitioner was on bail but thereafter he was unable to present himself on account of aforesaid illness and his bail bonds were forfeited and non bailable warrants were issued. In the circumstances, the petitioner appear through his counsel and moved an application u/s 70(2) Cr.P.C. for converting non bailable warrants to bailable warrants which has been rejected by the court below and revision petition has also dismissed.

3. Learned counsel submits that on account of bonafide reasons as above, the petitioner could not appear and the provision u/s 70(2) Cr.P.C. must be applied liberally.

4. Heard learned PP who is opposes the submission made by the petitioner.

5. I have considered the submissions.

6. This court finds that the reasons for non appearance of the petitioner is bonafide and genuine.

7. Keeping in view the nature of the case and law as laid down settled by this court from time to time, this court finds that the order passed by the learned trial court is erroneous. The petitioner ought to be granted liberty in terms of section 70(2) Cr.P.C and and he is also to be kept present himself before the trial court.

8. Keeping in view thereof, the application moved u/s 70(2) Cr.P.C. is allowed. The order passed by the trial court dated 30th July, 2018 and order passed by Learned Session Judge 3.10.2018 are set aside. The petitioner shall be present on 22.1.2020 before the trial court alongwith bail bonds and also participate regularly in the proceedings.

9. The cr.misc. Petition is accordingly allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top