SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 336

SANDEEP MEHTA
Amina – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Yogendra Singh Charan, for the Appellants; Mr.Mukhtiyar Khan, P.P, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

2. Both the petitioners are present in the Court. They being major persons claim to have performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat to their lives at the hands of their parents. The petitioners allegedly approached the S.P. Bikaner with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

3. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522 , the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the S.P., Bikaner to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Bikaner shall have the matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top