DINESH MEHTA
Dimpal Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Concededly, the petitioner has applied as an OBC-NCL category candidate pursuant to the advertisement dated 18.6.2018 issued for the recruitment on the post of Female Health Worker.
2. Inspite of opportunity granted by the State for all the MBC candidates to change/amend their category by the cut off date, the petitioner neglected and did not do the same.
3. It is only after publication of the result, the petitioner realizing that persons having secured lesser marks than her in the MBC category have been given appointment, she has woke up from her slumber and approached this Court.
4. Admittedly, the petitioner does not even have an MBC certificate till today.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that petitioners status as an MBC category candidate is not in dispute and merely because the petitioner has failed to furnish requisite certificate and change her category, her valuable right, cannot be denied. In support of his arguments, learned counsel relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. Reported in (2016) 4 SCC 754.
6. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.