SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 363

VIJAY BISHNOI
Manoj Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta Mr. Bhavesh Trivedi, for the Appellants; Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No. 86/2019 of Police Station Sadar District Sriganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 8/22, 29 of the NDPS Act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the prosecution story, the police have apprehended two persons Tinku @ Arpit and Rahul while they were transporting cough syrups containing narcotic contraband in a truck. It is further submitted that during the course of investigation co-accused Tinku @ Arpit informed the police that he procured the said vials of cough syrup from one Monu Singh and when Monu Singh was arrested, he gave the information to the police that he procured the said vials of cough syrup from Manoj and Raju @ Rajkumar. It is submitted that except the information given by co-accused persons while in police custody, no other evidence is available on record to connect the petitioners with the commission of crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited att

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top