SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Motilal Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Sanju Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred against the order passed by the Board of Revenue dated 9.7.2019 whereby the application for seeking transfer of appeal pending before Settlement Officer cum Revenue Appellate Authority Alwar to any other RAA has been rejected.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had moved an application to decide the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act but same has not been decided by the learned RAA. Learned Counsel submits that a. separate application was also moved in this respect for non-maintainability of the appeal but the same has also not been decided. Learned Counsel submits that the concerned RAA is bent upon to hear and decide the appeal itself and reference to Order 41 Rule 3-A CPC to submit that application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act ought to be decided. Learned Counsel relies on judgment passed by Supreme Court in Gagandeep Pratishthan Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Mechano & Anr., 2002 (1) SCC 475 whereby the Supreme Court has directed to decide application for condoning the delay first before deciding the appeal. Learned Counsel, therefore, submits that he had rig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.