RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Babulal Choudhary - Appellant
Versus
Laxman Das Bajaj - Respondent
Criminal Misc Petition No. 3576 of 2017
Decided On : 25-10-2017
Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Defence Evidence - Trial under section 138 of NI Act - The court allowed the petition and quashed the orders of the lower courts, directing them to give one last opportunity to the petitioner for producing his defence evidence.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order of the lower court which dismissed the revision and upheld the order dismissing the application for defence evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the lower courts rightly closed the defence evidence due to the petitioner's failure to submit it despite sufficient opportunities. However, considering the broader cause of justice in a trial under section 138 of NI Act, the court allowed the petition and directed the lower courts to give one last opportunity for producing the defence evidence.
Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner should be given another opportunity to produce defence evidence in the interest of justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of the trial under section 138 of NI Act and the potential detrimental impact of concluding the trial without defence evidence on the broader cause of justice.
Final Decision: The court quashed the orders of the lower courts and directed them to give one last opportunity to the petitioner for producing his defence evidence, subject to the submission of a specified cost within a specified period.
JUDGMENT
ORDER
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973 against the order dated 24.08.2017 passed by learned Additional sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Udaipur in Criminal Revision No.34/2017 by which he has dismissed the revision preferred on behalf of the petitioner and upheld the order dated 20.05.2017 passed by learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur in Regular Criminal Case No.1325/2013 whereby the application for defence evidence was dismissed.
2. The learned courts below have rightly closed the defence evidence on account of the petitioner not submitted the same even after given sufficient opportunities.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that any reopening of defence evidence shall prolonged the proceedings.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the interest of justice, one last opportunity may be given for producing the defence evidence.
5. The matter pertains to a trial under section 138 of NI Act and therefore, any conclusion of the trial without defence evidence shall be detrimental to the broader cause of justice. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the present petition is allowed and the impugned orders dated 20.05.2017 & 24.08.2017 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur and learned Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Udaipur respectively are hereby quashed and set aside and the learned courts below are directed to give one last opportunity to the petitioner for producing his defence evidence only if he submits the cost of Rs. 5,000/- before the learned court below within a period of 15 days from today which shall be deposited with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.