SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2736

VIJAY BISHNOI
Ranveer Singh @ Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Om Rajpurohit, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 12.01.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Churu (hereinafter referred to as ''the Tribunal'') in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 95/2000, whereby the Tribunal has rejected the application filed by the petitioner for premature release of the amount kept in FDRs in terms of award passed in his favour.

2. The Tribunal has rejected the application of the petitioner while relying on the decision dated 10.03.2014 passed by this Court at Jaipur Bench rendered in Kapil Lodha vs. The Judge, MACT (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 300/2009) while holding that since the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review its order, it cannot order for premature release of the amount kept in FDRs in terms of the award passed by it.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment dated 10.05.2017 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court rendered in Vimla & Anr. vs. The Learned Judge, Accidental Claims Tribunal, Churu (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3590/2017) and Hari Ram & Anr. vs. Judge, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Churu (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3669/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top