SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH MAHESHWARI
GHANSHYAM – Appellant
Versus
ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE (FAST TRACK) NO. 4, M. A. C. T. CASES – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.—On 16.5.1999, while travelling as a passenger in a bus bearing registration No. RJ 21-P 0450 from Khinvsar to Jodhpur, the petitioner sustained injuries when the said bus collided with an oncoming truck bearing registration No. AS 25-8813. The petitioner and so also several other victims of such vehicular accident filed their respective claim applications seeking compensation; and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal [Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 4], Jodhpur, proceeded to make a common award in their relation on 26.11.2005. So far the petitioner's case (Claim Case No. 884 of 2004) was concerned, the learned Tribunal awarded him compensation in the sum of Rs. 9,000 together with interest at the rate of 7.5 per cent per annum while fastening equal liability on the insurer of the bus and the owner of the truck involved in the accident.

2. Being aggrieved of the quantum of compensation awarded and seeking enhancement, the petitioner has chosen to prefer this petition for writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the said award dated 26.11.2005.

3. Perusal of the record makes out that petitioner applied for the certif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top