SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 513

SANGEET LODHA, RAMESHWAR VYAS
Nisha Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.L. Joshi, Advocate, Kirti Pareek, Advocate, Haidar Agha, Advocate, Salman Agha, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sangeet Lodha, J. - This appeal is directed against order dated 3.11.18 passed by the Family Court No.1, Jodhpur, whereby an application preferred by the appellant under Sections 24 & 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short "the Act of 1955") claiming maintenance for herself and her minor daughter has been partly allowed. The maintenance claimed by the appellant for herself has been denied, however, the respondent has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month for the minor daughter.

2. The facts relevant are that the respondent filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act of 1955 seeking decree of divorce against the appellant. During the pendency of the petition, the appellant preferred an application under Section 24 & 26 of the Act of 1955 seeking maintenance for herself and minor daughter, a sum of Rs.60,000/- and litigation expenses 1,15,000/-. The appellant is employed as Pharmacist and earning Rs.46,000/- per month. The appellant alleged that the respondent who is employed as Assistant Professor in Psychiatrist in the Government Medical College is earning Rs.50,000/- per month as salary. That apart, according to the appellant, he is earning Rs.1,00,000

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top