SANDEEP MEHTA
Kailash Chandra Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.
2. These three misc. petitions involve identical question of facts and law and are thus being decided together by this common order.
3. These misc. petitions have been preferred by the accused petitioners herein seeking quashing of the FIR No. 1/2018 registered at the Police Station CPS ACB, Jaipur, Outpost Nagaur for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC and Sections 13(l)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1988')-
4. The respondent No.2 lodged a complaint to the District Collector, Nagaur and also to the Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan and the I.G.-First, A.C.B., Jaipur alleging that wholesale irregularities and illegalities were committed in the sale 75 bighas of land made in favour of Kailash Chandra Agarwal and Nand Bihari (Petitioners of Misc. Petition No.159/2018) and that the revenue officers concerned i.e. Land Record Inspector Chhotaram, Patwari Ramratan and Tehsildar Tejmal Choudhary, while recommending the sale deeds, had hatched a conspiracy to facilitate the fraudulent sale and thereby, they
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.