JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J. - The matter has come up on an application filed by the respondents under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for vacation of the interim order. However, learned counsel for the respective parties jointly are in agreement that these writ petitions itself may be disposed of finally at this stage.

2. In the present bunch of writ petitions, the answers as finally approved of questions no.13, 24, 25, 40, 41 and 49 are under challenge.

3. For question no.13, initially in the answer key, the correct answer reflected was "B" which was challenged by the petitioners. However, the examining body, after considering the objections and opinion of the expert, has retained the answer as option "B".

4. For question no.24, originally the answer key reflected the same to be deleted against which objections were filed whereafter on the basis of opinion of the expert, the option "A" has been treated as the correct answer in the final answer key.

5. The question no.25 was originally deleted in the first answer key. However, after receiving objections and report of the expert committee, option "C" has been treated as the correct answer.

6. For question No.40, o