SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1

PRAKASH GUPTA
Mohd. Akeel – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Iqbal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.S. Hasan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Prakash Gupta, J.

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners-applicants (for short, 'the applicants') under Article 227 against the order dated 5.8.2020 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Tonk (for short, 'the Tribunal'), whereby the application filed by the applicants under Order 7 Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 CPC and Section 21(3) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short, 'the Act of 2001'); as also the application under Order 7 Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 and Section 21(3) of the Act of 2001 read with Section 45 of the Evidence Act have been dismissed.

2. Facts of the case are that the applicants filed an original petition under Section 9(A), (I) (E) and (F) of the Act of 2001 against the respondents-non applicants (for short, the non applicants') before the Tribunal. During the pendency of the original petition, the applicants filed two applications before the Tribunal - (one) under Order 7 Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 CPC and Section 21(3) of the Act of 2001; and (two) under Order 7 Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 and Section 21(3) of the Act of 2001 read with Section 45 of the Evidence Act. The Tribunal dismissed both the applications vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top