SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Manoj Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Vide order dated 05.03.2020, we had formulated the following questions/issues to be answered by the State through Mr. Farzand Ali, learned G.A.-cum-A.A.G:-
2. Whether suitable amendments have been entered in various prison rules so as to synchronize the same with the amendments brought around in the penal statutes viz. Penal Code & POCSO etc.
3. Whether steps have been taken to enhance the available accommodation in the Open Air Camps for keeping pace with the increase in number of convicts.
4. Whether appropriate steps have been taken by the State Government for prison reforms in compliance of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of In Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons: AIR 2016 SC 993."
2. By the same order, we had observed that Mr. Farzand Ali would be at liberty to take assistance from the Criminologist and Researcher Ms. Smita Chakraborty. However, unfortunately, the matter never came to be listed thereafter.
3. Alongwith this matter, two more writ petitions, namely, D.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.