VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Sunil Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
1. The present third bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 125/2019, Police Station Pipar City, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 346 & 376(2)(N) of IPC, under Sections 5(L) & 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and under Sections 3(1)(W)(I) & 3(2)(V) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the after the rejection of the second bail application of the petitioner on 10.08.2020, the statement of Mst. 'S' has been recorded before the trial court. He further submits that petitioner and Mst. 'S' were known to each other and were regularly talking on mobile phone. The fact of talking on mobile phone with the present petitioner has been accepted by Mst. 'S' in her statements before the trial court. In her statements, she further stated that she has gone with the present petitioner to Ahmedabad by public transport i.e. the bus of Pooja Travels
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.