IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA, JJ.
Subhash Khichad - Appellant
Versus
State and Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 382 of 2020
Decided On : 14-01-2021
Parole - Regular Parole - Rules of 1958 - Rule 9, Rule 9-A, Rule 10-A, Rule 13, Rule 18
Fact of the Case:
The convict petitioner sought release on first parole of 20 days, but the respondents opposed, citing abscondence after a previous parole and the applicability of Rule 18 of the Rules of 1958.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the convict was not entitled to be released on first regular parole of 20 days due to abscondence after a previous parole.
Issues: The issue revolved around the entitlement of the convict to be released on first regular parole of 20 days despite abscondence after a previous parole.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Rules 9, 9-A, 10-A, 13, and 18 of the Rules of 1958 to conclude that abscondence from any type of parole, whether regular or emergent, would entail consequences as laid down in Rule 18.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as being devoid of merit.
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Mehta, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the convict petitioner Subhash Khichad seeking a direction for release on first parole of 20 days. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment vide judgment dated 26.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No. 1/2014. It is averred that the petitioner's application for release on first parole of 20 days has not been decided by the competent authority.
2. Notice of the writ petition was issued to the respondents and a reply has been filed on their behalf. It has been categorically mentioned in the reply that the convict was released on 15 days' parole on 08.03.2017 in furtherance of the order dated 06.03.2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Hanumangarh, but he did not report back at the prison on the scheduled date and went absconding, upon which a criminal case was registered against him. On 13.05.2017, information was received that the convict was arrested and lodged at the Central Jail Bhatinda in another case. Thus, his custody was sought from the said jail and he was brought back and lodged at the Central Jail, Bikaner to undergo his life sentence. In these circumstances, the respondents have pleaded that the convict has lost the right to be considered for grant of regular parole under Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1958') and that he can now only seek release on parole under Rule 18 of the Rules of 1958.
3. Learned counsel Mr. Kaluram Bhati vehemently and fervently submits that the consequence of denial of parole upon abscondence flows only if the convict has breached the conditions of "regular parole" of 20, 30 or 40 days, as the case may be, granted under Rule 9 of the Rules of 1958, whereas the convict petitioner herein had been released on emergent parole of 15 days and thus, this restriction would not apply to the present circumstances and the petitioner herein is entitled to be released on regular parole of 20 days.
4. Per contra, Mr. Abhishek Purohit, associate to Mr. Farzand Ali, G.A.-cum-A.A.G., has vehemently and fervently opposed the submissions advanced by Mr. Bhati. He points out that the consequence of Rule 18 of the Rules of 1958 that the convict will not be entitled for release on regular parole flows from the fact that after being released on parole, whatever its nature be, the convict has misused the liberty so granted to him and absconds. The factum of abscondence plays prime role for denial of regular parole to the convict and the nature of parole, on which the convict was released, whether regular or emergent, is immaterial. He, therefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petition.
5. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced by the counsel for the parties and have considered the relevant statutes.
6. The right of a convict to be considered for release on regular parole of 20, 30 and 40 days and emergent parole flows from Rules 9 and 9-A of the Rules of 1958. For ready reference, these Rules are reproduced here in below:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.