SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 59

SANDEEP MEHTA
Nirmla Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :R.S. Mankad, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Farzand Ali, AAG-cum-GA and B.R. Bishnoi, AGC.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioners herein seeking quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 642/2011 registered for the offences under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 50(1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, pending in the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate ('CMM'), Jodhpur Metro.

2. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal the instant misc. petition are noted here in below:-

    The Food Inspector, Jodhpur visited premises of M/s. Shriram International (Unit of Shriram Hotel), Residency Road, Ratanada, Jodhpur on 29.04.2011, where he met Vikas Shrivastav (Seller & General Manager). Food articles viz. vegetables, Rotis, Paneer Pakoda etc. were being prepared and served to the public in the hotel. The Food Inspector collected sample of food article Paneer (cottage cheese) from the cold storage of the hotel. The sample of Paneer was divided into three parts, one of which was forwarded to the Local Health Authority, Jodhpur for analysis from where, a report dated 25.05.2011 was received to the effect that the food article (Paneer) was adulterated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top