MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Mohit Taneniya S/o Shri Chotelal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER
1. Appellant has filed this application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that there is no legally admissible evidence on record against the appellant and he has been convicted on surmises and conjectures only. File submitted that the appellant was on bail during trial and he did not misuse his liberty of bail. Fie submitted that the appellant is in custody since 26.02.2021, hearing of the appeal is likely to take considerable time, application for suspension of sentence of co-accused Ganesh Meena has already been allowed by this Court and prayed for suspension of sentence of appellant during pendency of the appeal.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.
4. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.
5. Looking to the nature of allegation against the appellant, he being on bail during trial and release of co-accused Ganesh Meena on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the appellant vide judgment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.