SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
RANA RAM – Appellant
Versus
PAYAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for Appearing Parties
Mr. N.L. Joshi, For the Appellants; Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP Dr. Shailendra Kala, for complainant, For the Respondents

ORDER

1. The petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. PC, for the following prayer :

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed this misc. petition may kindly be allowed by quashing the criminal proceedings Original No. 182/17 under section 125 Cr. P.C., (Payal Vs. Rana Ram) pending in Family Court No.l, Jodhpur and Domestic Case No.226/17 (Payal Vs. Rana Ram) pending in Metropolitan Magistrate No.8, Jodhpur. "

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and respondent entered in wedlock on 14.5.2011 as per Hindu rites and customs and out of their marriage a daughter was born on 14.2.2013. Due to strained relationship a divorce petition was filed on 25.9.2012, in which an application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act was filed by the respondent, that came to be allowed on 16.10.2014 whereby certain interim maintenance was granted. The respondent thereafter filed another petition U/s.12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 on 28.7.2017 alongwith an application U/s.23 of the Act for grant of monetary relief. The respondent then filed an application under Section 125 Cr. P.C., on 06.12.2017, which has now been allowed and a ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top