IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4874 of 2021
Decided on : 20-09-2021
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Sections 482 and 457 - Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953 - Section 52 to 56, 5252A, 52B, 52C, 60 & 68 - Delhi Excise Act - Sections 61 and 33 - MMDR Act - Sections 21, 21 and 15 - Indian Penal Code,1860 – Sections 323, 353 and 379 - Unlawful possession of forest produce - Punishment for theft – Voluntarily causing hurt - Seizure of property liable to confiscation - Power to release property seized under Section 52 - Subsequent procedure - Whether it is directed that all police stations shall release vehicles – Whether registered owners of vehicles in question shall be paying requisite compensation/compounding fee, it is directed that active bank guarantee, equivalent to compensation/compounding fee, shall be deposited by registered owners before trial court before release of vehicles
Findings of the Court - Parting with present controversy, it is directed that all police stations shall release vehicles in question, may it be tractor, trolley, truck, dumper to registered owners of the said vehicles, after confirming from respective Department that there is no confiscation proceeding, under the mining or forest laws, going on in regard to vehicles in question - Concerned parties i.e. registered owners of vehicles in question shall be paying requisite compensation/compounding fee, it is directed that active bank guarantee, equivalent to compensation/compounding fee, shall be deposited by registered owners before trial court before release of vehicles in question - Bank guarantee equivalent to compensation/compounding fee is deposited before trial court concerned, to which concerned police station is attached, trial court concerned shall be required to keep such bank guarantees intact, until final conclusion of proceedings; and until final conclusion of such proceedings is done by competent courts, bank guarantee shall remain subject to it and the orders passed at the end of proceedings by concerned trial court shall govern disposal of bank guarantee - clear that petitioners shall be required to furnish photographs of their respective vehicles, showing their numbers, colours - Furthermore, at time of release of vehicles in question, petitioners shall give an undertaking before concerned learned trial court along with bank guarantee
Result: Petitions stand disposed of
ORDER :
1. In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. Counsel for the parties agree that the controversy involved in this petition is covered by judgment passed by this Court in Kalu Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.4975/2021, decided on 18.09.2021), which reads as follows :-
2. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
“It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this Criminal misc. petition of the Petitioner may kindly be allowed and the order dated 23.04.2021 in Criminal misc. application u/s 457 Cr.P.C. by which learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Jahajpur, District Bhilwara, imposed the conditions and ordered to deposit the compounding fee within 15 days and rejected the prayer of the applicant/petitioner under section 457 of Cr.P.C. for releasing the seized vehicle, and against the order dated 13.08.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Shahpura camp Jahajpur, District Bhilwara (Raj.) in criminal revision no.28/2021 Kalu versus State, by which revision petition of the petitioner was rejected and affirmed the order passed by the A.C.J.M. Jahajpur, may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent that order to the petitioner, for depositing the amount as pre condition and directions may kindly be issued to the respondents to release the vehicle trailor no. RJ 06 GB 8112, chassis number MBIUPDHDXGRTR6190, of the petitioner on supurdginama without insisting for payment of compounding/penalty amount.”
3. While taking into consideration the contextual facts of this case and upon a perusal of the record, this Court finds that the present case is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Kishore Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3595/2021, decided alongwith other connected petitions, on 15.09.2021). The said judgment dated 15.09.2021 reads as under:
“1. In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. All these petitions have been preferred against the orders passed by the learned courts below, whereby the applications under Sections 451 & 457 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners seeking release of vehicles of different categories were rejected or allowed on condition of paying compounding fee, and therefore, looking to commonality of the issue involved herein, the present petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
3. The present petitions pertain to release of the vehicles of different categories, which have been seized by the respondents (State authorities), in various cases under the Mining Laws, namely, The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017; Forest Law, namely, the Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; and the Indian Penal Code, in connection with illegal mining and unlawful transportation of mineral, like bajri/sand, coupled with unlawful possession of forest produce, and illegal transportation thereof.
4. The exercise of power under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. is under judicial scrutiny in these petitions, and the extraordinary strictness in the mining and forest laws to deal with the subject, are the core issues of the present adjudication.
5. Mr. Radheshyam Mankad, Mr. Rakesh Matoria, Mr. H.S. Rajpurohit, Mr. Trilok Joshi, Mr. Rakesh Arora, Mr. Abhishek Mehta, Mr. Bhawani Singh Mertia, Mr. Rohitash Sin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.