SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 170

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Om Prakash S/o Hajari Daroga – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Meghwal S/o Shri Nathu Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Nahar & Mr. Pushkar Tamini
For the Respondent: Mr. Pritam Joshi, Mr. Himanshu, Mr. Vipul Singhvi

JUDGMENT :

(1) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1122/2018

(2) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 839/2018

(3) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 846/2018

(4) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 847/2018

(5) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1111/2018

(6) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1113/2018

(7) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1118/2018

(8) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1121/2018

(9) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1124/2018

1. These appeals are preferred against the judgment and award dated 09/08/2017 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara in claim case Nos.230/2014, 228/2014, 229/2014, 227/2014, 234/2014, 231/2014, 235/2014, 236/2014 & 232/2014 on behalf of the appellants/claimants who suffered various injuries on account of the accident occurred on 12/09/2013.

2. The Tribunal, after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence on record and hearing counsel for the parties, decided the claim petitions of the appellants/claimants.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants sustained simple injuries for which the Tribunal awarded a meagre sum as such the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top