Hanuman Singh S/o. Shri Suraj Singh vs State Of Rajasthan Through PP.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 176

SANDEEP MEHTA, RAMESHWAR VYAS
Hanuman Singh S/o. Shri Suraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through PP. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Kapil Gupta with Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Mr. R.S. Sinsinwar.
For the Respondent: Ms. Rekha Madnani, AGA.

JUDGMENT :

MEHTA, J.

1. The appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide Judgment dated 24.09.2016.

2. Being aggrieved of their conviction and sentences, the appellants have preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeal are noted herein below:

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Section 302/34 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.2,000/- each	6 Month’s S.I.
Section 323 IPC	3 Months’ S.I.
Section 341 IPC	1 Month’s S.I.
All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

4. The victim Gopal son of Jagannath Kothyari lodged a written report (Ex.P/1) to the SHO, Police Station Bowli on 24.11.2013 alleging inter alia that he was working in his field. In the afternoon at about 3 O’ Clock, the accused Hanuman Singh, Gopal S/o Ramkishore, Kuldeep, Bahadur, Jai Singh, Rasaal and Sampat, with an intention to do mischief, put a water pipe on the passage on which, the complainant requested them that the pipe be removed because the passa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 176

SANDEEP MEHTA, RAMESHWAR VYASHanuman Singh S/o. Shri Suraj Singh – AppellantVersusState Of Rajasthan Through PP. – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

SANDEEP MEHTA, RAMESHWAR VYAS
Hanuman Singh S/o. Shri Suraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through PP. – Respondent