SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 473

SANDEEP MEHTA
Suraj – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate, Farzand Ali, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate, Vinod Kumar Sihag, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.43/2021, registered at Mahila Police Station, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 323, 504, 382, 427, 354 & 34 of the IPC.

3. It is stated that the parties have arrived at a compromise. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Suraj S/o Shri Hawa Singh and (2) Rahul S/o Shri Ajay Choudhary in connection with FIR No.43/2021, registered at Mahila Police Station, Hanumangarh, the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

    (i). that the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top