SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 472

ARUN BHANSALI
Kala Singh Baldev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shravan Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Trilok Joshi, for the Appellant; Mr. Sunil Bishnoi, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This leave to appeal has been filed by the applicant qua the judgment and decree dated 15/3/2010 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Sangaria, District Hanumangarh in civil original suit no. 20/2004, whereby, the suit filed by the respondent - plaintiff for specific performance of the contract has been decreed.

2. It is inter alia indicated that on 25/11/2000 an agreement claims to have been executed by the respondents - Balkaran Singh and Jaskaran Singh in favour of respondent no.1, Shravan Singh, for the land ad measuring 3 bigha. The sale deed was to be registered by 30/12/2001, which date was extended upto 30/4/2003 and, thereafter till 30/4/2004. On 5/8/2003, Jaskaran executed sale deed in favour of the applicant for a part of the suit land. Whereafter, five more sale deeds dated 15/5/2004, 15/7/2005, 27/9/2005, 25/1/2006, 6/10/2006 and 28/6/2007 for small parcels of the said land were executed in favour of the applicant by Balkaran/Jaskaran and Smt. Gurucharan Kaur.

3. On 14/7/2005, the plaintiff filed the suit seeking specific performance of the contract dated 25/11/2000. The defendant appeared before the trial court, however, did not disclose the fact of sale deed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top