SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Malam Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 2021
Decided on : 06-04-2021

Advocates appeared:
Varun Arora, Advocate, Mohd Javed Gouri, Advocate

The entitlement of the appellant to be released on bail during the trial under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015 was established based on the overall facts and circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Bail Appeal - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - The court allowed the bail appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the entitlement of the appellant to be released on bail during the trial.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed a bail appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015, challenging the order rejecting his bail application in connection with FIR No.106/2020, for offences under Sections 342, 376 & 506 of the IPC and under Sections 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(w)(i) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after considering the statement of the prosecutrix and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, concluded that the appellant deserves indulgence of bail during the trial and allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order and ordering the release of the accused-appellant on bail.

Issues: The main issue was the entitlement of the appellant to be released on bail during the pendency of the trial, considering the serious nature of the charges against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, leading to the conclusion that the appellant is entitled to be released on bail.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the order dated 22.01.2021 was set aside, and the accused-appellant was ordered to be released on bail during the pendency of the trial, subject to certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - As per office report, notice of the bail appeal has been served upon the respondent No.2/complainant. However, no one has appeared on her behalf despite service.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the impugned order as well as the challan papers.

3. This appeal has been preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015 being aggrieved of the order dated 22.01.2021 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Bikaner in Bail Application No.149/2021 rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant who is in custody in connection with FIR No.106/2020, Police Station Sheruna, District Bikaner, for offences under Sections 342, 376 & 506 of the IPC and under Sections 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(w)(i) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

4. The prosecutrix is a major married woman, aged about 32 years. After going through the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., I am of the opinion that any comment on the veracity of the statement may prejudice the trial but in any event, the appellant deserves indulgence of bail during trial. Thus, having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant is entitled to be released on bail.

5. Consequently, the appeal is allowed. The order dated 22.01.2021 is set aside and it is ordered that the accusedappellant Malam Singh S/o Shri Hadman Singh arrested in connection with FIR No.106/2020 Police Station Sheruna, District Bikaner shall be released on bail during pendency of the trial; provided he furnishes personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top