SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 488

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sangeet Lodha,Rameshwar Vyas, JJ.
Shambhu Ram - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 10457 of 2018
Decided on : 01-04-2021

Advocates appeared:
Devi Lal Vyas, Advocate, Harshit Bhurani, Advocate

The central legal point established is that land forming part of gair mumkin agore, i.e., catchment area, cannot be divested for any other use, and encroachments on such land deserve to be removed.

Headnote:

Encroachment - Gair Mumkin Agore Land - Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, Section 16

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to remove encroachment and restore the status of gair mumkin agore land. The land was diverted for expansion of abadi, and pattas were issued to individuals. The petitioner argued that the land forming part of gair mumkin agore cannot be divested for any other use.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the land forming part of gair mumkin agore cannot be divested for any other use, and all encroachments made on the land deserve to be removed. The orders divesting the use of disputed gair mumkin agore land were set aside, and the respondents were directed to take appropriate proceedings for cancellation of the pattas and removal of encroachments within three months.

Issues: The main issue was whether the land forming part of gair mumkin agore could be divested for expansion of abadi and other purposes, and whether the pattas issued created any right in favor of the allottees.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 16 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, which specifies the lands in respect whereof no khatedari rights shall accrue, including land set apart for public purposes or works of public utility. The court also referred to previous court decisions and directions issued for the protection of catchment areas and removal of encroachments.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the orders divesting the use of disputed gair mumkin agore land were set aside. The respondents were directed to take appropriate proceedings for cancellation of the pattas and removal of encroachments within three months.

JUDGMENT

Sangeet Lodha, J. - This writ petition (PIL) is filed by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to remove the encroachment and restore the status of gair mumkin agore land comprising khasra no.431 measuring 19.18 bighas and khasra no.433 measuring 19.02 bighas of Village Sanvreej, Tehsil Phalodi, District Jodhpur.

2. Precisely, the case set out by the petitioner is that the lands ad measuring 24 bighas & 18 biswas comprising khasra no.431 and 24 bighas & 2 biswas comprising khasra no.433 were recorded in the revenue record as gair mumkin agore. Out of the said land, 5 bighas land in each khasra was divested by the State Government vide order dated 28.6.94 for expansion of abadi. After diversion of the land for abadi purposes as aforesaid, the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat issued pattas to many persons including his relatives. The legality of the pattas issued was questioned before the revisional authority by one Shri Chunni Lal. The revision petition was allowed by the Additional District Collector (II), Jodhpur vide order dated 31.3.08, however, the persons who were allotted the land continued in possession. Later, Gram Panchayat, Sanvreej adopted a resolution for diversion of 10 bighas land each out of the land comprising khasra no.431 & 433. The District Collector, Jodhpur vide order dated 9.8.02 allotted 20 bighas land, 10 bighas each out of land comprising khasra no.431 & 433 to the Sarpanch, Gram Panchat, Sanvreej for the purpose of expansion of abadi. The petitioner served the respondents with the notice for demand of justice for restoration of gair mumkin agore land, but to no avail. Hence, this petition.

3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the land forming part of gair mumkin agore i.e. catchment area of nadi or talab, cannot be divested for any other use and thus, the respondents are under an obligation to restore the land of catchment area and all encroachments made on the land forming part of the catchment area of nadi, deserve to be removed.

4. A reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the State taking the stand that the land measuring 32.15 bighas comprising khasra no.431 and measuring 27.02 bighas comprising khasra no.432 was recorded in the revenue record as gair mumkin agore during the settlement. Out of khasra no.431, land measuring 7.17 bighas and out khasra no.433, land measuring 3.00 bighas was recorded as sadak (Road) in the name of Public Works Department. Thereafter, the land measuring 5 bighas each from khasra no.431 & 433 was allotted to Gram Panchayat for expansion of abadi. The said land was mutated in the name of Gram Panchayat vide mutation no.882. Later, the land measuring 10 bighas each out of aforesaid khasras, was allotted by the District Collector to Gram Panchayat, Sanvreej for expansion of abadi and the land was mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat vide mutation entry no.1015. It is submitted that 15 bighas each from the aforesaid khasras stand converted for abadi purposes and there are residential houses and shops are existing at the site and only small portion of the land is lying vacant.

5. By way of an additional affidavit, it is brought on record by the petitioner that the pattas issued in favour of eight persons have been cancelled and three persons have constructed shops over the disputed land and many persons are occupying the land unauthorisedly. It is averred that certain persons have constructed their shops over the disputed land whereas the pattas were issued by the Gram Panchayat for residential purpose.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the land forming part of gair mumkin agore, the catchment area of nadi or talab cannot be divested for any other use and thus, the pattas of the said land if any, issued do not create any right in favour of allottees and the same deserve to be treated as non est. Relying upon decisions of the Supreme Court in the matter of Jagpal Singh & ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors.: 2011

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top